Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.

Important!

1. The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
2. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
3. The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
4. If you decide that a report should be filed, place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
   • * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
5. Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
6. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.

This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.

You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This page was last updated at 05:53 on 12 April 2025 (UTC). if it is out of date.

Reports

Bot-reported

• 82.19.39.142 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 61 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user removing references, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:14, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

  I have some concerns about sourcing, but I don't think these edits are vandalism. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:47, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

• 191.104.43.251 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1086 three times in the last 5 minutes (Disruptive edit summaries, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:13, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

  Most likely a FP. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:51, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

• Fip1777 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1241 (User talk page disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:17, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

  User is globally locked. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:52, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

• 49.37.8.93 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:18, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

  No disruption since being warned. But this was clearly disruptive. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:54, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

• Cbareta (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1241 (User talk page disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:19, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
• 111.90.198.242 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1321 (LTA 1321, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:47, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

User-reported

• Foristslow (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) He keeps removing the term "Gogyo Aikido" and adding the term "Wuxing Heqidao" and spam link [1]. Knowing the existence of Template:efn, he keeps adding the sentence "The agents in their generative creative cycle are consecutively, Wood, Fire, Earth, Metal and Water" or something like that. UU (talk) 05:11, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

  Content dispute. Consider dispute resolution. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 05:36, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

  Hi can you please help us work this out, I have left comments on this user's talk page also on the page talk page. Not discussing only reverting edits. I am a long time editor on the page called wuxing ( Chinese philosophy). What I am saying is in the efn ( I have gone to the tea house to get advice on how to change this as I do not believe that it is completely accurate) and also the wuxingheqidao is supported by the references. I have asked for references but nothing only reverting if you look at the time line of our conversation it will hopefully apparent that he is not wishing to have a conversation and is also pushing some kind of pov. . Some help would be great. On another note no message was left on my talk page and I was not pinged for the last dispute and nothing was discussed with me on talk. Very confusing. Thankyou in advance for some help and guidance. Foristslow (talk) 05:43, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

  But User:Foristslow refused to attend the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Wuxing (Chinese philosophy), how can I obtain Wikipedia:Third opinion? UU (talk) 05:44, 12 April 2025 (UTC)